"Aging in place" may be a choice for some, but not for all

"Aging in place" has come to mean elders living in their homes as long as possible, with the necessary and appropriate accomodations coming to them. Often, this means adapting the physical aspects of the house (e.g., grab bars in bathrooms) and in-home assistance for personal care or health care.

A recent Washington Post story explores the options of aging in place for elders, including the necessity of doing so for some because of the recession.

"One of the unwritten tragedies of the current housing price collapse is that for a host of reasons [e.g., money, job security, depreciated properties], a higher share of older Americans will be 'forced' to age in place, who might otherwise have considered alternative housing arrangements," said Stephen Golant, a gerontologist and geographer who teaches at the University of Florida.

But as a whole, many people may choose to stay in their homes for as long as possible. (Who among us hasn't heard an elderly relative express such a preference, especially over nursing home care.)

The article continues by quoting Peter Bell, executive director of the National Aging in Place Council: "Boomers may be more cognizant of the need to plan ahead because they have had to deal with their parents in a reaction mode."

Furthermore, most of the considerations of home accessability and personal care apply to people with disabilities of any age.

A recent story from the New York Times explains how architectural design, whether original or adapted, can successfully accomodate various levels of ability. As the designer featured in the story said, "[People] are only disabled if they can't do what they want to do. Architecture can eliminate disability by design."

(Photo by kamaru; used by permission.)